CHRISTIANITY: A PRIVATE ECCENTRICITY

No sinister cabal plots in smoke-filled rooms to destroy Christianity. There is, however, a desire amongst progressives to privatise Christianity. They wish to restrict it to the level of a personal eccentricity, harmless as long as it doesn’t intrude into the public square.

It is increasingly difficult for a Christian to state what the Bible says and what the church has believed for 2,000 years, and maintain a role in public life in today’s Britain.

Today, Tuesday 22 January 2019, a Christian magistrate is appealing against the decision to remove him from his post after expressing a biblical view of the family.

Richard Page

After an exemplary 20-year record on the bench, Richard Page found himself disciplined by a Cabinet minister, Michael Gove, and the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Lord Thomas.

Big guns to bring against a Kent magistrate. Page’s offence? Expressing a Bible-based view of family life.

During a closed-door consultation with two colleagues in a routine adoption case in July 2014 Page, a hitherto respected member of the family court, expressed a view considered beyond the pale by progressives. Having reviewed the evidence, Page decided that his legal duty to act in the best interests of the child meant he could not place the child with a same-sex couple.

His colleagues made a formal complaint, claiming he had applied his Christian beliefs in his decision-making. Page was reprimanded in 2014 after it was judged that he had been influenced in the case by his religious beliefs as a Christian. He was also instructed to undergo equality training.

Page later said: ‘I hold the view that it is in the best interest of the child to have both a mother and a father, and I believe this to be a lawful and reasonable position for a family court judge to hold.

‘It could be that an adoption by a same-sex couple or a single person is in the best interest of the child, but a report would need to satisfy me of that.

‘I believe this is a reasonable and fair position, and not one of discrimination.’

Expressing this position, upheld by millions throughout the UK, was considered so outrageous that it led to a formal investigation by the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office’s disciplinary panel. They recommended to the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor that Page should be removed from office for serious misconduct. 

Page was removed from the magistracy on 29 February 2016 for bringing the judiciary into disrepute. A few days later he was suspended from his role as a non-executive director at Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust.

On the other side of the debate, in a speech in May 2018, Lord Justice Munby, then President of the Family Division, said that he welcomed and applauded single-parent, unmarried, three-parent, and polygamous households; the demise of the typical nuclear family was, by implication, not a matter of concern.

No action has been taken against Lord Munby.

The decision to remove Page from the magistracy was upheld by the Employment Tribunal on February 2018. He asked for leave to appeal.

In allowing his appeal to proceed Her Honour Judge Katherine Tucker said judges are permitted to hold even ‘intolerant’ views that should be respected – but that there may be limits as to how they can be expressed so as not to impugn the impartiality of the courts.

Responding to the decision, Page commented: ‘It is vital that we maintain the true independence and impartiality of the judiciary and that ordinary people like me are not excluded from it.’

Consistently, Christians are being frozen out of public life. This has happened in nursing, in counselling, in teaching, and amongst registrars. Equality legislation initially enacted to protect minority groups is now being used to marginalise the Christian minority.

Page’s appeal will be heard at the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Central London today. 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “CHRISTIANITY: A PRIVATE ECCENTRICITY

    1. That is how progressives see it. Some of them believe Christians need psychiatric help to free us from the superstition which harms us and the rest of society.

  1. I think Christians now need to take seriously that the UK is actively legislating against them and this means, of course, against God. The national churches of Scotland and England have been almost silent, corporately, in speaking out against this. In fact, in Scotland the Church has been actively working hand in hand with the Nationalist Government to get as much “progressive” legislation passed as possible, irrespective of how harmful this will be to bible believing Christians and how offensive to our Lord.
    Within the space of about 20 years (max) we have gone from an almost universally held traditional view of marriage (which was able accommodate liberalising and de-criminalising homosexuality) to it being a crime not to want to celebrate same sex marriage and trans-sexuality. What else is coming down the line? I wouldn’t bet against paedophilia and incest becoming increasingly normalised. It’s already happening and something I’m sure the CoS will support.
    Accompanying this has been a whole raft of other laws – in particular covering equality and hate – which work directly against anyone holding opposing views to what the State and its liberal elite have ordained as acceptable.
    The main casualties in this attack on what we recognise as freedom based on our Christian heritage and values is primarily Christianity but also anyone holding views which contain even a tincture of being right of centre.
    If Islam or any other group or community was under such sustained attack by the State there would be riots and declarations of solidarity from all sorts of politicians. But because it is Christianity and Christians who are on the receiving end – Radio Silence. Even the Church is silent (see above). Not surprising really when you consider that for the past 50 years or so Christians have taught to be silent unless it is to support some left wing cause like nuclear disarmament or abortion. How often do you hear a Christian say, when confronted with some obvious transgression, “we mustn’t judge.” I was once told by a Session Clerk, talking about a minister at the General Assembly who was speaking in favour of SSM, and after registering disagreement with me said, “But after all, we mustn’t judge.” So after listening to something that was going to harm him, his church, all he believed in and was most certainly transgressing God’s commands he still felt he couldn’t make a judgement call on it. Is it any wonder we are where we are today? The CoS has succeeded in anesthetizing its flock. Any relief from the insanity that is being unleashed will only come with the repeal of many of these laws. Can we honestly see that happening any time soon? The Church needs to forget nuclear disarmament, open borders, gay rights, trans rights, tampon poverty, the EU and every other left wing issue it has adopted and concentrate on what God has commissioned it to do and that is to proclaim his Word – not support laws which suppress it. We need to apply the hand brake now!! Before it is too late.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s